Microservices offer great promises — modularity, scalability, independent deployments. But many teams stumble into traps that turn their “microservices wins” into pain. Here are five common mistakes developers make — and how to steer clear.
1. Mistake #1: Poor Service Boundaries & “Wrong Granularity”
What Happens
Developers sometimes carve microservices in ways that are too fine-grained or too coarse:
- Services that do little more than CRUD for a single entity — so many that changes require touching multiple services.
- Or services that are too “fat,” carrying too much responsibility and becoming monolithic again.
- Dependencies become tangled, and coordination between services becomes heavy.
This is a known anti-pattern: improper service boundaries.
Why It’s a Problem
- Increases coupling: changes ripple across services.
- Reduces independent deployability & autonomy.
- Makes debugging, versioning, and coordination harder.
How to Avoid It
- Use Domain-Driven Design (DDD) and bounded contexts to define service boundaries.
- Use business capabilities rather than technical layers as the dividing line.
- Start with coarser services, refactor gradually as need emerges.
- Monitor coupling: if two services change together often, reconsider merging or redesigning.
2. Mistake #2: Shared Database / Data Coupling
What Happens
Developers sometimes allow multiple services to read/write the same database tables or schema. Or service A queries tables owned by service B directly.
This breaks the principle of service autonomy and leads to tight coupling.
Why It’s a Problem
- Violates encapsulation: services’ internal data leaks.
- Changes in one service’s schema break others.
- Makes migration, scaling, or independent upgrades nearly impossible.
How to Avoid It
- Each microservice should own its own data (database or schema) and expose APIs for access.
- Use event-driven synchronization (publish/subscribe) or data replication patterns if other services need derived data.
- Use caches or asynchronous data flows rather than direct coupling.
3. Mistake #3: Creating a “Distributed Monolith”
What Happens
Under the guise of microservices, a system ends up being a tightly coupled network — services depend on each other too much, and deployments must be coordinated across many services.
This is often called a distributed monolith.
Why It’s a Problem
- You lose many benefits of microservices: independent deployability, failure isolation, scaling.
- A failure in one service cascades.
- Release coordination becomes painful again.
How to Avoid It
- Ensure loose coupling between services (asynchronous communication, message queues, event-driven architecture).
- Use circuit breakers, timeouts, fallback strategies to prevent cascading failures. (circuit breaker is a common pattern in distributed systems)
- Design APIs / contracts intentionally rather than ad hoc coupling.
4. Mistake #4: Neglecting Observability, Monitoring & Logging
What Happens
Teams build many small services without decent instrumentation — limited logging, tracing, metrics. They monitor only each service in isolation, but not how they work end-to-end.
One of the “don’t omit observability” mistakes listed in Thoughtworks’ microservices lessons.
Why It’s a Problem
- When something fails, it’s hard to trace root causes across services.
- Debugging distributed systems without trace visibility is extremely painful.
- You lose visibility into performance, latency, error propagation, bottlenecks.
How to Avoid It
- Implement distributed tracing (e.g. OpenTelemetry, Jaeger), request IDs across API calls.
- Collect metrics (latency, error rates, throughput) per service and aggregate.
- Use structured logging, correlation IDs, context propagation.
- Define SLAs / alerts for cross-service performance degradation, not just single-service metrics.
Empirical studies show that complexity of microservices increases difficulty in monitoring, testing, and design.
5. Mistake #5: Inadequate Testing, CI/CD & Contract Management
What Happens
Developers treat testing like monoliths — heavy end-to-end tests, few or no contract tests, no automation pipelines for each service.
They also skip or weakly enforce API contract versioning between services.
Why It’s a Problem
- New releases break consumers downstream.
- APIs can change incompatibly, causing runtime failures.
- Deployments become risky and manual.
How to Avoid It
- Implement contract testing (consumer-driven contracts) so service consumers and providers agree on API behavior.
- Automate CI/CD pipelines per microservice — build, test, deploy independently.
- Use versioning and backward compatibility strategies for APIs.
- Incorporate unit, integration, end-to-end tests, and end-to-end tests across service boundaries.
- Use test data isolation and test doubles / stubs for dependent services.
6. Bonus Mistakes & Overarching Themes
Here are a few additional pitfalls worth watching:
- Adopting microservices too early — organizations jump in before they are ready (automations, culture, team structure).
- Inconsistent standards / tech fragmentation — too many frameworks, inconsistent API styles, lack of uniform governance.
- Ignoring technical debt & postponed refactoring — microservices systems accumulate debt; lack of continuous cleanup hurts long term.
- Overreliance on synchronous communication — synchronous calls across microservices introduce latency and coupling. Better to prefer asynchronous or event-driven designs.
7. Bringing It All Together: Your Action Plan
| Mistake | Key Mitigation / Best Practice |
|---|---|
| Poor service boundaries | Use DDD, start coarse, refactor, monitor coupling |
| Shared databases | Each service owns its data, use eventing or APIs for cross-service data |
| Distributed monolith | Loose coupling, patterns like circuit breaker, fallback, asynchronous APIs |
| Weak observability | Implement traces, metrics, structured logging, cross-service dashboards |
| Inadequate testing / contracts | Use consumer-driven contract tests, CI/CD pipelines, versioning, automated tests |
Steps to adopt these in your next project:
- Begin with clear domain modeling and bounded contexts.
- Define API contracts before implementation.
- Set up automated pipelines and enforce contract tests early.
- Instrument services from day one (tracing, metrics, logging).
- Monitor coupling and service dependencies, refactor when needed.
- Use resilience patterns (timeouts, circuit breakers, retry, fallback).
- Review and evolve standards, governance, and practices continuously.
Conclusion & Key Takeaways
Building microservices is powerful — but only if executed with discipline. Many developers stumble into common traps: bad boundaries, data coupling, distributed monoliths, lack of observability, and weak testing/contracts.
By recognizing these mistakes ahead of time, applying domain-driven design, enforcing contracts, instrumenting properly, and automating rigorously, you give your microservices architecture a greater chance to deliver its promise.
Additional Resources: